Design Features in Running Shoes

There are lots of different running footwear models and brands, and they’re all possibly manufactured to meet the needs of each distinct athlete. Each manufacturer will use their unique set of characteristics and every model made by each brand name features a different group of design attributes that they make use of. The problem with the suggesting and buying running shoes is usually that each and every runner have a distinct foot shape and size in addition to a distinct method in which the foot functions and the way that they run and every one of this really needs to be coordinated to the suitable attributes of a running shoe to meet up with their requirements. These kinds of distinct characteristics include features like the drop, that is the distinction between the height of the running shoe beneath the front foot in comparison to the rearfoot. The level of shock absorption in various areas of the running footwear may also vary in different running footwear and is just one more varied design attribute. A number of runners want more extra padding, and some runners need much less. The midsole which is the bottom part of the footwear is among the features of the running shoe which varies the most. The shoe’s midsole may be a single density or even dual density.

The dual density feature is what is called a medial post. This is when there is a increased density substance inside the midsole around the medial aspect of the midsole only. The medial posting was first created in 1984 in the X-Caliber GT running shoe that later became the ASICS Kayano. The initial function of this particular medial post feature had been as one of a variety of movement control design attributes in running footwear to manage ‘overpronation‘ of the feet in the athlete. Back then ‘overpronation’ had been considered an issue for runners. This is when the foot toll medially excessively at the ankle joint, therefore it may make some sense that the footwear be more solid in this medial part of the midsole in an attempt to end this. However, the evidence on the medial posting actually being able to do that is not great. The reason for this really is that the medial posting will have different types of impact on various athletes and exactly how well which it functions will depend on exactly what causes the ‘overpronation’. This is in addition depending on the idea that something really needs to be undertaken in regards to the ‘overpronation’, which isn’t always the case. In some athletes, this medial posting is particularly useful mainly because it could shift the center of ground reaction forces more medially. This will likely alter lever arms around the joints in the feet and many clinicians find that significantly beneficial in the treating of some runners’ conditions.

Medial posting being a design attribute which is used in running footwear is now being made use of much less now and a few brands have stopped using this design feature. That’s a pity simply because it still should have helpful uses in a number of runners who can benefit from this. It’s not necessarily destined to be of much use for athletes that do not require it.

Advertisement:

SaleBestseller No. 1